Wiki Design : MCSCA Library Wiki


Ms. Sangeeta Dhamdhere

CATEGORY
Excellent
Good
Average
Scope for improvement
Color Choices
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links form a pleasing palette and looks professional. Contents are consistent across pages.
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links do not detract from the content and looks good. Contents are consistent across pages.
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links do not detract from the content and do not look professional.
Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links make the content hard to read or otherwise distract the reader.
Contact Information
Every Web page contains a statement of authorship, school name, and date of publication/date last edited.
Almost all Web pages contain a statement of authorship, school name, and date of publication/date last edited.
Most (75-80%) Web pages contain a statement of authorship, school name, and date of publication/date last edited.
Several Web pages do not contain a statement of authorship, school name, and/or date of publication/date last edited.
Content
The wiki has a well-stated clear purpose and theme that is carried out throughout the site.
The wiki has a clearly stated purpose and theme, but may have one or two elements that do not seem to be related to it.
The purpose and theme of the site is somewhat muddy or vague.
The wiki lacks a purpose and theme.
Learning of Material
The student has an exceptional understanding of the material included in the wiki and where to find additional information. Can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the wiki.
The student has a good understanding of the material included in the site. Can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the wiki,
The student has a fair understanding of the material included in the site. Can easily answer most questions about the content and procedures used to make the wiki.
Student did not appear to learn much from this project. Cannot answer most questions about the content and the procedures used to make the wiki.
Spelling and Grammar
There are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Wiki.
There are 1-3 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Wiki.
There are 4-5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Wiki.
There are more than 5 errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar in the final draft of the Wiki.
Layout
The Wiki has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
The Wiki have an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.
The Wiki have a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.
The Wiki are cluttered looking or confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
Video
Video quality is very good and sound is good. The text/annotations used in video makes students understand the content of video very clearly.
Video Quality and sound is good. No annotation used.
Video is good but sound is not good
Video is not very clear and also sound is not clear.

Date Created: May 15, 2016 08:08 pm (CDT)


Copyright © 2000-2007 Advanced Learning Technologies in Education Consortia ALTEC

To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address:
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse





copyright.JPGThis page is created and copyrighted by Ms. Sangeeta Dhamdhere on 16th May 2016